Modular Monolith Architecture
Overview
A modular monolith keeps one deployable application while enforcing strong module boundaries internally.
Why It Works
- Simpler operations than microservices
- Clear domain ownership by module
- Easier transactional consistency
flowchart TD
A[Single Deployable App] --> B[Orders Module]
A --> C[Billing Module]
A --> D[Catalog Module]
B --> E[(Shared DB with module boundaries)]
C --> E
D --> E
Practical Example
A module exposes only application services, while internal entities remain private to prevent cross-module coupling.
Production Example
Growing teams often start with a modular monolith and extract selected modules into services only when scaling or release constraints justify the cost.
Common Pitfalls
- Treating modules as folders without dependency rules
- Direct table access across module boundaries
- Allowing shared utility modules to become dumping grounds
Key Takeaways
- Modular monolith is a strong default for many products.
- Boundary enforcement is critical for long-term maintainability.
- Extraction to microservices should be evidence-driven.